Talk:Mangral

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mangral article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Jammu and Kashmir Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article needs major reorganisation[edit]

I've cut out a lot of chunks to make new independent articles (which can be wikilinked back into context), which has at least trimmed the size down. However, the article is still massively disordered, particularly chronologically. Bits about fighting the Dogras, and the Anglo-Sikh Wars, are put right next to sections about Partition, etc. Plus there are several sections of only a sentence or two which need to be merged in somewhere else. Does nobody else notice the near unintelligibility of this article? MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:36, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what is the origen of mongral rajputs<'raja mustafa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.153.149.115 (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Highly controversial and disputed article. There is no reference of Mangral Rajputs in ancient books. Completely fabricated and misleading. I am surprised this article is still online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.236.111 (talk) 17:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]