Talk:Manitowoc Shipbuilding Company

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Subsunk?[edit]

There's an evident conflict in sources. Lenton credits only 19 fleet boats to Manitowoc, & the other 9 to EB (p.95). Who's right? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 20:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jane's Fighting Ships of World War II, Fahey's The Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet (Victory Edition), and Kafka & Pepperburg's Warships of the World all agree with Silverstone. I'm not sure that makes Lenton wrong, but he's certainly outnumbered. Thewellman (talk) 22:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Add Samuel Eliot Morrison's History of United States Naval Operations in World War II to those supporting Silverstone rather than Lenton on Manitowoc's production. Thewellman (talk) 22:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This has a list. NavSource and DANFS lists USS Mero (SS-378). Navsource even has launch photos and a Commemorative post card postmarked in Manitowoc to celebrate the keel laying. Same for Menhaden (SS-377) If Lenton lists Mero and Menhaden as EB, then I'd say that would be wrong. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manitowoc Shipbuilding Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080922163047/http://shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/2large/inactive/manitowoc.htm to http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/2large/inactive/manitowoc.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Design 1044 ship" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Design 1044 ship and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22 § Design 1044 ship until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 05:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]