Talk:Manwel Dimech

File:Manuel Dimech.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Manuel Dimech.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 1 November 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Manuel Dimech a poet and a philosopher?

This article claims that Dimech was a poet is based on unnamed and unpublished poetry books and a philosopher because he held a few, very general and unoriginal ideas which seem more to be a case of over-interpretation. I think both claims should go. Demdem (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks like this thread needs to be re-opened again. So here goes: what are the grounds on which Manwel Dimech can be called a "philosopher"? Or a "poet"?

Demdem (talk) 07:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Re. Dimech = philosopher, I refer you to M. Montebello, Dimech, PEG, Malta, 2004, Chapter IV, and there you'll find your answer. No more need be said here.

Re. Dimech = poet, no compendium of Dimech's poetry has been published so far, and thus a qualified judgement concerning his artistic ability in this field is still unwarranted. It is a fact that he does indeed have hundreds of all sorts of poetic compositions, and thus, until a better consideration should be given to them, the very fact of him possessing poetic compositions must qualify him as a "poet" (perhaps even of sorts, if you like; but a poet nonetheless). Even if a person is no Shakespeare, that does not mean he should not be considered to be a poet in his own (little, if you like) right.

--Katafore (talk) 21:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manwel Dimech. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131016063742/http://m.maltatoday.com.mt/magazinedetails/magazine/books/Wisdom-in-exile-Mark-Montebello-and-Francis-Galea-20121031 to http://m.maltatoday.com.mt/magazinedetails/magazine/books/Wisdom-in-exile-Mark-Montebello-and-Francis-Galea-20121031

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)