Talk:Marc Gopin

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

NSF2 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Published Works and Reviews

Including "blurbs" for Dr Gopin's work is not within Wikipedia guidelines, so they have been deleted.Petropetro (talk) 05:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the article/removing templates

There are four "fix this article" templates on the article. (1) Needs more citations. (2) Sounds like an advertisement. (3) Filled with irrelevant promo information. (4) May have been edited by someone connected to the subject.

(2) and (3) are similar. I'm working to get all of that out of the article, and then also to find additional information about Gopin from RSS, which will address (1). I'm not sure what the rules are for when it is fine to take off the "may have been edited by someone close to the subject" template. If that happened, it is always a historical reality about the article. But once I and others have removed all the advertisement and promotional content and tone, which is probably what was added by a person close to the subject, if indeed a person close to the subject did edit this article, at what point is it considered acceptable to remove a template like that? Novellasyes (talk) 15:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]