Talk:Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011

New Zealand: Politics / Māori / Law Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Māori task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the New Zealand law task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111002113930/http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/9069858/parliament-passes-marine-and-coastal-area-bill/ to http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/9069858/parliament-passes-marine-and-coastal-area-bill/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Reporting of Breach of Te Tiriti/The Treaty

The 2020 reporting section accurately quotes from the RNZ article, but the editorialising of the RNZ article misrepresents the Waitangi Tribunal report, which is apparent even from the section they quoted. The Waitangi Tribunal has not determined that the MACA Act itself is in breach of te Tiriti/the Treaty. Rather, the Tribunal determined, as a result of the first stage of its Inquiry, that the Crown's implementation of the Act has been in breach of te Tiriti/the Treaty.

The Tribunal has yet to determine whether or not the Act itself is in breach of te Tiriti/the Treaty. It will do so in Stage 2 of the MACA Inquiry, which is currently ongoing.

My preference would be for the article to be changed to reflect that it is the Crown's implementation of the Act, not the Act itself (yet), that was found to be in breach. I'm aware that Wikipedia places high priority on sourcing directly to media articles, but in this case this is a relatively minor misunderstanding, in a niche area of law.122.58.40.99 (talk) 00:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]