Talk:Mark Beech (writer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reference consolidation[edit]

Any time a single statement or series of statements is followed by 2 or more references, we should try to remove redundant references from that group. If it's a single statement, then there's no reason to have more than 1 reference. SOMETIMES a sentence or paragraph with multiple statements may need more than one reference, but we should try to reduce when we can.

As we do this, we should try to eliminate some references altogether. For example, if reference #1 is used to back up statements A, B, and C, and reference #2 is used to back up B, C, and D, and reference 3 is used to back up A and D, we typically don't need all 3 references. Keep the single strongest reference that backs up each of the statements A, B, C, and D. "Strongest reference" takes into account the overall quality of the reference (how reliable is it? how independent is it?) and how authoritatively and clearly it backs up the statement itself.

If after doing so you are still using all 3 references, decide if the harm done by using a lower-quality reference for one of the statements is worth the benefit of reducing the reference count. If the difference in quality is low and the article as a whole already has enough "independent, reliable references that, take together provide significant coverage of the topic" that nobody will challenge the topic's notability then it's a good idea to reduce the reference count. On the other hand, if removing one of these references would leave the article open to a notability-based challenge, or if the substituted reference is significantly inferior, then it's fine to keep all 3 references. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Beech (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]