Jump to content

Talk:Mark Goudeau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Out of date

[edit]
Out of date

This article is already out of date since they caught the serial shooter(s) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.15.191 (talkcontribs) 16:02, 5 August 2006‎ (UTC)[reply]

Not out of date

Actually, these are two completely separate cases. The Baseline Killer is unrelated to the Serial Shooter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.17.26.4 (talkcontribs) 13:51, 7 August 2006‎ (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Possible break in case

[edit]

Phoenix police get possible break in case

Useful in improving/updating the article. Thanks. --129.130.38.93 17:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"believed to be captured" not "captured"

[edit]

The first line was incorrect. The correct information is that the Baseline killer or rapist is believed to be captured, moving it to passive tense is "was believed". The man arrested has not admited or convicted of the crime. There might be proof of the crime but we don't have conclusive proof on the site nor a link explaining why it MUST be him, so for now I changed it to "believed to be captured".Kinglink 21:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Up Tag

[edit]

I have added a clean up tag because I spotted two careless typographical errors in the first paragraph alone; and the other text I have examined in the article appears to be in need of proofreading and correcting. There seems to be a recurring problem with verb tense, as well as awkward phrasing. Just to pick one example, "On 4 September 2006, Phoenix police announced they've arrested a suspect. . . ." The word "they've" should not be used in a Wikipedia article; it is too informal. And, actually, the sentence would sound much better if rendered "On 4 September 2006, Phoenix police announced the arrest of a suspect. . . ." --Skb8721 21:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let's clean it up!

[edit]

I hope people will continue to research and edit this article. I've been doing my best to clean it up, but there aren't as many sources as I had hoped. Any suggestions on where to look for more details? Newspapers are my number one source, but those are becoming repetitive. Any chance that anyone has access or could get access to any legal documents for this case or the Serial Shooter case?

Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point

[edit]

Meaning of the name

[edit]

The article doesn't answer the basic question. Why is he called the Baseline KillerKinglink (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The killings happened off of Baseline Road from what I can remember. - Stephoswalk (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That is correct, but I think we need this cited in the article. I can't find a solid link but someone who is more familiar with this case probably has something. It's just annoying as this is a great "first look" site, and this is something I feel should be on this site.Kinglink (talk) 22:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've added an explanation of the name to the opening sentence, although it might be worded a bit awkwardly. - Stephoswalk (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

www.markgoudeauinnocent.com

[edit]

Is it entirely appropriate to mention/cite this website (www.markgoudeauinnocent.com) in regards to Mark's past "rape" charges considering that it was set up by his wife? It certainly doesn't seem neutral in that it states the "victim" is "unemployed" as thought that is pertinent and unless there is further evidence to support the site's claims I think it should be removed.

[edit]

The image Image:Mark Goudeau.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing needed on the DNA matters

[edit]

The article has a detailed attack on the state's DNA expert and testimony at trial. All of that needs sourcing. It appears to be accurate, but needs transcript page numbers, or cites from newspaper articles. As is, it is completely unsourced and original research, right or not. Pv86 (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sentencing

[edit]

He was sentenced to death: http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/30/justice/arizona-baseline-killer/?iref=obnetwork. 174.109.163.170 (talk) 13:10, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Baseline KillerMark Goudeau – Shouldn't the article be changed to the person's name now that we know the person's name? Hoops gza (talk) 22:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support we did the same with the BTK killer and the Unibomber and I don't see anything different here. Barring good reason to doubt that this person is actually the killer I see no reason not to move the page.-174.93.164.125 (talk) 04:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Goudeau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Goudeau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]