Talk:Mark McCormick (Santa Barbara)

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 December 2019. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.
It was contested by Casanova88 (talk · contribs) with the comment:
Added reasoning in opposition for deletion...will edit later. Articles must never have PROD or deletion tags placed again.

Soap Operas

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Requested move 14 May 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 00:07, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– Supporting character on a defunct daytime serial whose entire role lasted eight-and-a-half months and ended more than 30 years ago. The Mark McCormick (disambiguation) page also lists an article for a non-fictional person — Mark McCormick (judge) and four WP:DABMENTIONs. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 21:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support – I don't even think this is a controversial move.— TAnthony^Talk 22:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support In ictu oculi (talk) 06:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly support per nom. Paintspot Infez (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.