Talk:Marvel Swimsuit Special/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 03:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Starting review Kingsif (talk) 03:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Kingsif: Hi, just wanted to inquire about the status of this review. Do you know when you'll be able to continue? Morgan695 (talk) 16:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Morgan695: When I remember I didn't finish it - I had it on a watch so it wouldn't have been much longer, but thanks for the ping! Pasted review below, sorry for the wait! Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kingsif: Hi, edits have been made. Morgan695 (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Morgan695: When I remember I didn't finish it - I had it on a watch so it wouldn't have been much longer, but thanks for the ping! Pasted review below, sorry for the wait! Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Style
[edit]- Lead could be a little longer, based on the overall length of the article
- Development section written well - fluid and nice
- Need a ref for "parody advertisements and fake interviews" sentence - I checked sources so I imagine it's in one of the nearby refs, but for ease, this warrants one at the end.
- Not sure the Marvel Swimsuit Special #1 description should be presented as an 'e.g.' Perhaps replace as "One was the Marvel Swimsuit Special #1, which is set..." - or similar.
- Coming off this, see coverage comment
- Reception section good
- Revivals section good
- Needs attention one little thing
Coverage
[edit]- Lead gives good coverage
- Good coverage of development
- May need some more coverage in Content, specifically having descriptions of the other comics as well as Marvel Swimsuit Special #1.
- Good coverage of reception; perhaps a bit light on critics (only 4, though the series was prolific) but seems representative enough
- Seems to use all available info about revivals
- Needs attention one little thing
Illustration
[edit]- Good use of table
- Good idea to illustrate gender equality; good selection of appropriate images for it
- Pass
Verifiability
[edit]- Sources look good
- Slight concern over Comicbook.com, but it seems reliable for what it is being used to source
- Pass
Stability
[edit]- History squeaky clean
- Pass
Neutrality
[edit]- Looks clear
- Pass
Copyright
[edit]- Check looks clean
- All images fair use, with solid reasoning for each
- Pass
Overall
[edit]on hold - see notes. Very close, just a few little things. Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Nice work! Kingsif (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)