Talk:Mary Scudamore
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: possible deletion
[edit]She does have an ODNB article, Simon Adams, ‘Scudamore , Mary, Lady Scudamore (c.1550–1603)’, unfortunately I can't access it. However, I think if she's notable enough for them, she's notable enough for WP. Boleyn (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Have now added some info from ODNB. Boleyn (talk) 20:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- The ODNB citation and the privy chamber status mentioned seem sufficient to me to decline the speedy deletion tag, which I should add seems to me to have been placed in good faith; this is a judgment call on my part. If someone feels strongly about this entry's possible non-notability, I suggest an articles for deletion process. If you have questions or problems, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
OK, on further examination she does just about pass notability. PatGallacher (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Start-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages