Jump to content

Talk:Maryland Route 331

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMaryland Route 331 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 6, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 331/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Starting GA review. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail criteria assessment

  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
  3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

No problems with quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    • \i made some copy-edits to improve the grammar.
    b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    • tagged and licensed
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: