Talk:Maryland Route 70/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 02:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Either tonight, if I'm up to it, or tomorrow. –TCN7JM 02:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Alright. Let's get this started.

...or not. I have read the article twice and found no errors. So...

Final verdict

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: Congratulations on having the first article that I have passed without putting on hold.

   Pass/Fail: