Talk:Masaru Emoto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,




I have just modified one external link on Masaru Emoto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific facts vs personal opinions[edit]

Hi guys

Sorry, I have to wonder, is there anyone behind you, or it's really the way you think? Anyway, what about a chance to just report unbiased facts, rather than personal and unfounded opinions? Humanity welcomes! Cheers! Cmcordova (talk) 02:46, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- see the section Masaru Emoto#Scientific criticism and the article Pseudoscience - Epinoia (talk) 02:57, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article does not include available supporting experiment from PubMed[edit]

In order to be more balanced, this article should note the double blind experiment found on PubMed: reference: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16979104/

DLPELF (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coauthored by the subject, this may well fail wp:sps.Slatersteven (talk) 17:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article does not include available supporting experiment from PubMed[edit]

Hello, In reading the biased current Wiki article, I felt compelled to look elsewhere to see if Mr. Emoto's theories had been more thoroughly tested elsewhere and I found this on Pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16979104/ which somewhat supports his hypothesis. In order to present a more balanced view, it should be provided as a source, as well. DLPELF (talk) 17:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)reference: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16979104/[reply]

Coauthored by the subject, this may well fail wp:sps..Slatersteven (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Wikipedia doesn't do WP:FALSEBALANCE. --Hob Gadling (talk) 18:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article is incorrect re: OIUAM shut down[edit]

Article here dated March 2023 proves the OIUAM is still operational despite being unaccredited by the India government. 2605:59C8:6EB:C010:700B:ADEE:DFF:1638 (talk) 08:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was in march last year. Slatersteven (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]