Talk:Maspalomas Dunes
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified (January 2018)[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maspalomas Dunes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161112093042/http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/cmayot/espaciosnaturales/espaciosnaturales/grancanaria/c7.html to http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/cmayot/espaciosnaturales/espaciosnaturales/grancanaria/c7.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Edits on "targeting" tourists[edit]
There have been several (very) similar edits by User:HelpfulJan and anonymous user(s) regarding the "targeting" of tourists by park rangers and/or police. These have been reverted by myself and other editors as they are not supported by a reliable source and/or appear to be original research. They also appear to represent the editors' opinions rather than neutrally representing fact. Casey boy (talk) 15:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)