Talk:Mass General Brigham

Hospitals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts / Boston Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston.

academic health center[edit]

a recent report by the AAMC refers to PHC as a leading academic health center, https://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/january2015/422194/health-system.html - link to [ [ Academic health science centre ] ] may be justified Velocipedus (talk) 01:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Write English[edit]

Typical Wikipedia. The History section, sentence one, no less, slams us w. an entity called Partners which you haven't defined. Sure, you do that farther on. But define it first, then invoke references thereto. And you wonder why this article has a 'C' rating.

Jimlue (talk) 02:49, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect claims in History section[edit]

The 3rd paragraph of the history section claims that MGB was 'one of the first health care systems in the nation to launch an electronic health record (EHR) system'. This is objectively false.

By 2015 Epic Systems (who actually developed/launched the system MGB is using) already had hundreds of US health care systems as customers. Kaiser Permanente (a significantly larger health care system) went live with their EHR system in 1994, a full 11 years earlier.

This paragraph should be removed from the article, as it is not notable history. 2620:72:0:111B:7CED:9853:9BE2:D4A7 (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From The Free Press: "Last Tuesday (April 2nd), Mass General Brigham announced it will stop reporting to child welfare officials suspected incidents of abuse or neglect solely because a fetus or a newborn is exposed to drugs."

https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/en/about/newsroom/press-releases/updating-system-policies-perinatal-testing Il Qathar (talk) 11:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing bias[edit]

This article appears to read like a marketing pitch for MGB. Subjective terms like "world leaders" are used as if they are objective facts. 47.176.60.147 (talk) 21:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]