Talk:Master Keaton

Untitled

I know this is a relatively old series, but after viewing the animé, I've come to several conclusions of which I wanted an answer. Having not found such, I propose that a summary of each episode discussing the accuracy of the subjects within each episode be fleshed out. Many cultural and historical ideas are combined throughout the series, so I wish to differentiate between fact and fiction.

As an example, the episode that discusses a family crest, is quite factual. I don't know about the protagonist (Angus T) of this episode, but the information regarding the symbols used on the crest and the ways in which the symbols are combined is entirely factual. By knowing that the barer of the bend sinister is a bastard, whence it was revealed later he was an illegitimate heir, it came of no surprise.

Another example involves the episode with the many bluffs Keaton uses to outwit his foes that carry guns. Since there are many fallacies in popular culture with firearms, I was refreshed to see a fictional show stick to the factual base.

With these two examples, I believe that an expansion, or another article, in entirety, needs to be created to explore and explain each episode and its related subject matter.

Mnkyslut 13:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Master Keaton cover.jpg

Image:Master Keaton cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Inconsistency?

"The manga's target audience was Japanese men in their 20's and 30's, a comparatively older target audience than is common for most anime series."

The sentence makes sense, but there is a hole in the semantics. Manga is often made for older readers, yet anime is usually made for younger viewers. Perhaps one or the other of "manga" or "anime" should be changed to match the other, in order to actually make a statement... problem is I don't know which since I wasn't the one who wrote it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.134.236.14 (talk) 20:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Master Keaton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130112195858/http://www.ex.org/3.7/17-anime_masterkeaton.html to http://www.ex.org/3.7/17-anime_masterkeaton.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)