Jump to content

Talk:Matches Fashion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content

[edit]

I changed the line "Matches also claim to foster" to "Try to work with". I agree that "Matches also remain committed to" was a bit subjective. Any thoughts? RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just passing by but my general thought is that there's a couple of phrases which just sound a bit too "corporate", the sort of things that would appear on a company's website but never on a third-party encyclopedia. Things like "bring them to their customer-base" or "try to present customers with a selection of" rather than "sell". RoyalBlueStuey, I note that you have started a couple of articles on fashion/marketing companies and appear to be privy to private details such as website hits, might I invite you to read WP:COI and declare any relationship you might have with Matches? Things like the web hits will have to go unless you can find a public source for them. Le Deluge (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Primary Sources

[edit]

I have added the requested primary sources. Does this means the Primary sources notation can come off? 81.137.18.46 (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The passing mentions like the McQueen one in the Mail don't really count, what you want are articles about the company like the Telegraph one. That one's OK, but more like that would be good - presumably there must have been articles in fashion/women's mags? Le Deluge (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I made edits whilst not logged in and the xlinkbot reverted them. I added links to Matches twitter and facebook pages. These are official outlets for Matches and were not on the list of frequently reverted links. If I am wrong to do this then I will not make further edits to include them. I am just assuming that it was because I wasn't logged in when making the changes. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 09:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, social media are WP:LINKSTOAVOID. In general though any links added by anonymous editors will be treated extra sceptically. Le Deluge (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]