Talk:Maureen Walsh

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Laurie Ferguson.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

United States: Ohio / Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Maureen Walsh is not to be confused with ...[edit]

... Maureen Walsh, English singer (see here and there). --Kolya (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2019[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Change:

In 2019, she argued against the right of nurses to have uninterrupted lunches and rest breaks, claiming that nurses "...probably play cards for a considerable amount of the day." [8] The Washington State Nurses Association denounced her statements as "incredibly disrespectful and patronizing."[9]

To:

In 2019, she argued that a bill to ensure the right of nurses to have uninterrupted lunches and rest breaks should be amended to exclude critical access hospitals that serve less populated areas, claiming that nurses at that type of hospital "...probably play cards for a considerable amount of the day." [8] The Washington State Nurses Association denounced her statements as "incredibly disrespectful and patronizing."[9] 73.97.106.80 (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit completedFrapsity (talk) 19:12, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Imbecile?[edit]

I didn't know that Wikipedia accepts and publishes opinions now. They may be correct, but they have lost a ton of credibility here. ANVIL9267 (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the edit. Thanks for reporting! S0091 (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's called vandalism. It happens. No, wiki has not lost "a ton of credibility" for allowing an insult to a very minor state politician to stand for a few minutes. Don't be ridiculous. 199.247.46.138 (talk) 04:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think they were referring to the editor who made the edit as the article is semi-protected for this reason. However, don't forget WP:GF, just because someone got upset about a sensational topic and made an edit in the heat of emotion doesn't mean there a bad person or a bad editor. Frapsity (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has been contaminated by liberal ideology and has become a little bit like an MSM outlet these days by deliberately leaving controversial opinions open for discussion. This name-calling behavior should never made it past the first draft.

Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2019[edit]

Shame on wikipedia for describing this sitting senator as an imbecile. Whether she is or not is immaterial. This is supposed to be a neutral site to get non biased information. Not the opinion of any author. 184.90.45.100 (talk) 21:11, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see comments above. The edit was reverted. S0091 (talk) 21:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]