Talk:Max Whitlock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max Whitlock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Max Whitlock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MovieTalk101178 (talk · contribs) 19:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA status over the next week. Thank you for nominating the article. MovieTalk101178 (talk) 19:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lead, info box, and early life[edit]

Nicely written sections. :)

Career[edit]

2010-11:

  • Whitlock won gold on pommel horse and floor exercise and silver in the all-around at the 2010 Junior European Championships held in Birmingham - Reference 10 seems to be junior and senior WAG?
    Whoops. This is fixed now. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • He also won the silver medal on the pommel horse - I don't see the source mentioning anything about Whitlock’s PH silver but it's possible I'm missing something?
    You're right, and I've added another source. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2012: Ok.

2013: Ok.

2014: Ok.

2015: 2015:

  • After the European Championships, his coach announced Whitlock would take a break from training to recover, during which he also cancelled any public appearances and stopped using social media. – Looking at the ref, I don't see anything about a social media break (although after tweeting that he resumed training, it's clear that he did take break). :)
    I couldn't find a source that he was off social media, so I just took that part out. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2016: Ok.

2017: Ok.

2018:

  • However, an error in his routine on the pommel horse caused him to finish seventh in the event final. – Going through the source, I don't see anything about Whitlock finishing 7th?
  • "Whitlock, 25, was seventh at the European Championships in Glasgow." -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2019: Ok.

2021:

  • The team took fourth place with a score of 255.76 – I don't see any final results listed in the ref?

2022-23:

  • Whitlock took 18 months off from training – I can see ref 76 says 10 months while ref 77 says 18.
  • I can't figure out this discrepancy, so I just changed the language to "took over one year off from training", is that fine? -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • During the pommel horse final, Whitlock fell and finished fifth. – I don’t see any mention of Whitlock placing 5th in the reference?
  • Added source that mentions the 5th place finish -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awards and honours[edit]

  • Whitlock finished seventh in the public vote for the 2014, 2015, and 2016 BBC Sports Personality of the Year awards. - It looks like Whitlock was 8th in 2015.

Personal life[edit]

  • Their first child, a daughter named Willow, was born on 23 February 2019 - It doesn’t look like the actual birthday of Whitlock’s daughter is cited in ref 89 unless I’m missing something? It does say February 2019 though. :)

Competitive history[edit]

Ok.

References[edit]

A few notes on references for future improvement. :)

  • Ref 5 requires subscription but based on the title and publisher, the source is reputable. I can see an archived version from Aug 4, 2026, allows the reader to view the full article.
  • Ref 8 requires subscription but based on the title and publisher, the source is reputable. I can see an archived version from 2016 allows the reader to view the full article.
  • Reference 44 requires subscription but the source is reliable based on the publisher.
  • Reference 52 requires subscription but the source is reliable based on the publisher.
  • Reference 62 requires subscription but the source is reliable based on the publisher.
  • Reference 63 requires subscription but the source is reliable b ased on the publisher.

Overall comments[edit]

This article is well written and very close to GA level. :) Thank you for nominating the article Riley1012! There are just some small issues (or questions) related to a couple of references. Let me know how it goes. :) MovieTalk101178 (talk) 01:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 07:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whitlock in 2012
Whitlock in 2012

Improved to Good Article status by Riley1012 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Max Whitlock; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • AT1 does not check out, as Miroslav Cerar also has two Olympic golds and three world championships on the pommel horse as well. Schwede66 14:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I see that now. I've changed the wording on ALT1. -Riley1012 (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added a 2nd QPQ per the backlog rule. I also changed ALT1 after looking into it further based on the comments above. I should've been more specific that Whitlock is the most successful on pommel horse at the Olympics with two gold and a bronze (while Cerar only has two gold). -Riley1012 (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wondered why all the citations in the lead, WP:LEADCITE. Probably leave them there until after the DYK since we need citations at end of sentence for the hook. The article became a good article on March 11 and was nominated the samer day so it qualifies for DYK. I do not find evidence of plagiarism and the article is neutral. The two qpqs are completed and the image offered here is correctly licensed, clear at this resolution and free. ALT0 is supported by a citation which says, "most successful British male artistic gymnast" I am not sure why the word "artistic" is used and wonder if ALT0 is missing that specificity. So I confirmed ATL1 as interesting and if a promotor can figure out that I have misunderstood gymnastics and what "artistic" means they can use ALT0. Bruxton (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bruxton: Artistic gymnastics refers to the specific discipline of gymnastics, as opposed to rhythmic gymnastics or non-Olympic disciplines like acrobatic gymnastics. There are other sources (1, 2, 3) that say specifically he's the most successful/decorated British gymnast (implying in any discipline). -Riley1012 (talk) 20:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Riley1012: Thank you. I thought it was my own ignorance. Bruxton (talk) 21:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]