Talk:May 1971

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Months in the 1900s (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Months in the 1900s, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Months in the 1900sWikipedia:WikiProject Months in the 1900sTemplate:WikiProject Months in the 1900sMonths in the 1900s articles

Jeff VanBemmel

A moment's searching came up with the fact that Jeff VanBemmel is the director of the US Army Signal Network Enterprise Center in Aberdeen, which I consider to be notable enough for this page. See http://www.afcea-aberdeen.org/files/bios/20110302%20Jeff%20VanBemmel%20Bio.pdf

More troubling is that multiple editors, one of which has been blocked five times previously for reverting rather than discussing, all think that WP:TALKDONTREVERT does not apply to them. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of proof is on the user adding the name to show that the person being added is notable, and that the date is verifiable. This is especially true given the number of users who try to add themselves, their significant others, etc. to these types of pages. If Jeff VanBemmel is a redlink (which it is at the time I write this), it is certainly reasonable to remove him from the list without the need for discussion here. —C.Fred (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I have stricken my comment above. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:14, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on May 1971. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128204636/http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/AngryBrigade/1971.html to http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/AngryBrigade/1971.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on May 1971. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091124175848/http://wissen.spiegel.de/wissen/dokument/dokument.html to http://wissen.spiegel.de/wissen/dokument/dokument.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]