Jump to content

Talk:Maytag

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Owned Brands Section

[edit]

Every bullet in this section is linked to articles that are related in name-only. It's really annoying. If it's going to be a link, then link to a page about the brand. An article that's subject-related rather than just name-related. If there's going to be a link at all, then make it to a dedicated wiki page about that business brand. But until those pages exist (or even if they don't get large enough to justify not getting merged into this article 5 years down the line), then don't link anything. tldr remove the links, and just leave a simple straitforward text-only list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.127.213.188 (talk) 20:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with this article

[edit]
  • There are many spelling and grammatical errors.
  • The history section is a company timeline pulled from the company's website. (at least we know it's accurate)
  • The section on Maytag's mascot, "Ol' Lonely", is copied from the company's website. (at least we know it's accurate)
  • The article is very biased towards the company.
  • The article does not mention the Maytag Neptune or the widely-publicised problems with it which lead to a class-action lawsuit. Andrew pmk 00:23, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actor Hardy Rawls who played the second "Ol' Lonley" did not die on 9/22/2003 as stated in the article. As of 12/02/06 he is alive, and living in the State of Florida.
  • Description of GFCI, given to customers to resolve safety issues with a leaky system, is technically inaccurate, and should probably give a link to RCD. (the general name for a GFCI, and the name of the wiki page for that device.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.57.3.195 (talk) 20:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE: As far as I can tell, these problems have ALL been fully resolved in the rewrites done since the author's unsigned comment in October 2007. Dellant (talk) 21:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recently Added

[edit]

Retail partners, seetlements and recalls

The recalls section needs to be removed, it's too "point in time" oriented and makes little sense in an encyclopedic context. Eli lilly 20:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got rid of the recalls section

[edit]

Though Maytag had product recalls which affected many, and were publicized, it does not seem to be encyclopedic. Take as an example, Ford Motor Company recalls millions of vehicles a year, but their Wiki article does not mention this. It's a slippery slope; if we're going to start devoting sections to every product recall a company carries out, we're going to end up with a lot of very bloated articles. If there is a product recall which is significant enough, it may warrant its own article, i.e. Ford/Firestone, Hydroxycut. But for now, these are gone. I figure it's been a long time coming. CharCoal (talk) 21:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Maytag logo.png

[edit]

Image:Maytag logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neptune issues are complex

[edit]

Various quality issues, poor PR, recalls, internal financial problems and external competition, etc, all added up to giving up on their own assembly line and having the Neptune name put on Samsung machines. In a sense, this was Maytag throwing in the towel on Neptune, while still profiting from whatever remaining value the brand had. The Neptune brand was retired when Whirlpool purchased the company. Maytag machines made by Whirlpool use the brand name Epic. Nospamtodd (talk) 04:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology Addition

[edit]

2014: The Maytag Repairman is replaced by the new Maytag Man, who is the human embodiment of a machine and portrays various Maytag appliances. Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/business/media/maytag-repairmans-new-job-keeps-him-busy.html

Ol' Lonely

[edit]

Propose title be renamed "Maytag Repairman" with the following copy at the bottom.

  • In January 2014, the character was changed to have a new attitude, function, and name as the human embodiment of Maytag appliances.


[edit]

Here is an official link to the new corporate logo that replaces the one currently on the page http://access.whirlpool.com/wdl/image/09001a50801849b2/view.do?format=preview — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.181.111.102 (talk) 15:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repairman

[edit]

In 2014 Maytag replaced the "old, bored" repairman with a younger, "can-do, more macho repairman, according to the article. But the "new" repairman was actually much older - the actor is older than the man who had had the role for seven years.119.224.13.116 (talk) 03:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Maytag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Maytag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maytag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maytag&oldid=1208890736"