Jump to content

Talk:McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet in Australian service/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Petebutt (talk · contribs) 21:14, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Well-written

(a) the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Pass
Factually accurate and verifiable

(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout; (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and (c) it contains no original research.

Pass
Broad in its coverage

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Pass
Neutral
it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
Pass
Stable
it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.[5]
Pass ish (not been in main-space long enough to tell, but it seems likely that it will pass. I suggest re-assess this criteria in one month.)
Illustrated, if possible, by images

(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Pass

Petebutt (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]