Talk:Međimurje horse

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Horse breeds task force.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Report discussion from Wikiproject Equine

Hello. These breeds seem be the same. There's no Murakoz or Međimurje in Hungary in DAD-IS, and Murakoz is cited as a possible name for Međimurje. A magyar-speaker said Murakoz is just hungarian name for Međimurje. We are discussing the merging in french, but there's a Wikidata problem as in english you have 2 separated articles too --Tsaag Valren (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the merge is needed, since they appear to be about the exact same breed and one article even says that the other name is merely a different name for the same horse. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 17:05, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We might be able to merge, but what is our evidence that these are the same breed as opposed to closely related breeds? For example, the Haflinger and the Avelignese are the same breed (though bloodlines may have diverged a bit) while the Azerbaijan horse and Karabakh horse, though related, appear to be different breeds (or at least the people who care, really care a LOT about defining them as different breeds). Also, how do we decide which name to use? (Probably whichever has the larger registry, perhaps? Or the original bloodstock?) I don't oppose the merge, I just want to be sure we have our ducks in a row. I'm going to ping Justlettersandnumbers as he has the language background to help address this question. Montanabw ^(talk) 23:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A scientific study saying "the Murinsulaner population was distributed in the territories of Croatia, Slovenia, Hungary and Austria, but the present population is limited to the area of Međimurje", is it OK ? => http://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/04939.pdf Tsaag Valren (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, though now we have a third word, "Murinsulaner" -- I think I'm going to ping Justlettersandnumbers because the language issues are more than I'm able to handle. He should have good advice. Montanabw ^(talk)|GO THUNDER! 04:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as I told Tsaag Valren on the French WP, Hungarian Muraköz, Croatian Međimurje/Medjimurje and German Murinsel are equivalent names for what is now Međimurje County, all using equivalent ways to derive, from the name of a given river (here the Mur), the name of the more or less triangular area between it and the river it flows into (the Drava): in Hungarian this is köz = "interval, place in between", in Croatian medji = "in between" in the former local dialect, and in German Insel = "island". They also all use equivalent ways to derive an adjective meaning "from Međimurje", which serves as the name of the horse breed: in Hungarian -i, in Croatian -ski and in German -(an)er, making respectively Muraközi, Međimurski and Murinsulaner. Oliv0 (talk) 16:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like whatever else we do, we better mention that in the final article or else we will have three different articles again! Montanabw ^(talk)|GO THUNDER! 21:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Međimurje horse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017070305/http://www.eaap.org/previous_annual_meetings/2010crete/papers/19_curik%2001.pdf to http://www.eaap.org/previous_annual_meetings/2010crete/papers/19_curik%2001.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]