Talk:Medusa (Six Flags Great Adventure)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Medusa (Six Flags Great Adventure) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Medusa (Six Flags Great Adventure) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 1, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Amusement Parks: Six Flags / Roller Coasters Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Six Flags task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as High-importance).

Comics: DC Comics / Superman Bottom‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Bottom

This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Superman work group.

Rename!

Since Medusa has *officially* been renamed "Bizarro" (http://www.gadv.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=16207&hl=), this will need some major work done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.75.157.171 (talk) 02:16, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

Should this article be renamed "Medusa (Six Flags Great Adventure)"?

Sponsorship

Medusa was sponsored by Heinz starting in the 2007 season. The employees were given a choice of flair that they were required to wear: either a hat that bore the Heinz logo, or a pin that read "Shakin' it up!" In the 2008 season, additional signs were added to the ride queue to further highlighter the corporate allegiance. However, the employees were no longer given Heinz hats or pins--some employees from the 2007 season still have their hats, though, and are permitted to wear them.24.228.50.83 (talk) 05:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

View

If you're going to talk about the views on Medusa, is it worth mentioning that as you go up the lift hill, you can see parts of the Safari? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.127.16 (talk) 01:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New photo needed

With Bizarro's new theming and coloring, the current picture of the cobra roll needs to be replaced. Halofan333 (talk) 23:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bizarro (Six Flags Great Adventure)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 20:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting a Good Article review of this article. North8000 (talk) 20:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review discussion

The article says that it was the world's first floorless roller coaster. The source for that claim just says that it was the first floorless one made by that particular manufacturer. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 20:30, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added a new source to support this. Existing source has been left to support the opening date. Themeparkgc Talk 05:14, 30

Resolved. Close enough. North8000 (talk) 11:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The statement "the speakers seldom worked." seems a bit uneclyclopedic and is unsourced. North8000 (talk) 20:34, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look around but couldn't find anything reliable to support it. I have removed the statement. Themeparkgc Talk 22:52, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Resolved. North8000 (talk) 00:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The "on-ride photo" text is confusing in a few ways. First, if it is referring to a particular image in the article, I think it should be clearer (possibly in the caption). Second, the "on ride photo" internal link go to an article that describes it as a stationary camera that takes pictures of the riders; noe of the images in the article seems to be that. Could you clarify? North8000 (talk) 00:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've relocated that information and reworded it to hopefully clarify and remove any confusion. The wording was referring to the location of the camera on the ride, not any picture in the article. Is the change sufficient? Themeparkgc Talk 07:46, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Resolved. North8000 (talk) 10:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria final checklist

Well-written

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 13:19, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria. Dialing in for the types of coverage expected for subjects such as this. North8000 (talk) 13:19, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria. Could still benefit from future expansion. Article is short, and it would seem like there are are additional areas to cover in the future in an expansion, but I can't think of any areas not covered that would constitute a shortcoming.

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 18:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 15:23, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Meets this criteria. Has three (free) images, plus a non-free logo image which has an article-specific use-rationale. North8000 (talk) 15:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Result

This passes as a Wikipedia Good Article. Congratulations! North8000 (talk) 13:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article

(This iis "repeated" here for when the review is no longer transcluded)

This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. Congratulations! North8000 (talk) 13:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC) Reviewer[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bizarro (roller coaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 05:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Medusa (Six Flags) → Medusa (Six Flags Great Adventure) – To distinguish this page from Medusa (Six Flags Discovery Kingdom). DReifGalaxyM31 (talk) 04:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support And unless I'm missing something this can probably be speedy and uncontroversial.--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The prior move should have been discussed before the move was made. Had that been done, we wouldn't be having this discussion.—JlACEer (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Rreagan007 (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page move March 7 2022

The move should not have been made until the discussion was closed, and the new page should have a space between Six Flags and the parenthesis.—JlACEer (talk) 01:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.