Talk:Meghalaya subtropical forests

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meghalaya subtropical forests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Info from Assam, Tripura and Nagaland areas[edit]

As I discovered by digging out and studying the basic sources for the ecoregion designation, southern Assam, most of Tripura and a tiny bit of western Nagaland is also covered by the IM0126 ecoregion designation. MacKinnon (1997) specifically. As the article is now, the body only accounts for the state of Meghalaya. Also, other important habitats than the sparse montane subtropical forests needs to be explained as well.

The name "Meghalaya subtropical forests" is very confusing. I would even go so far to call it misleading. However, I don't believe we have the capacity to change it here on Wikipedia though :-)

Just a sort of to-do-list. Cheers.

RhinoMind (talk) 03:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]