Talk:Meltdown Monday

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References[edit]

I found a reference for the use of the term Meltdown Monday and tagged it on just so there's something there. It remains to be seen if the term gets picked up more generally than at present (most of the uses I could find were on blogs, so not probably the best to cite to here, though probably enough to avoid accusations of neologism) but I suppose that just goes with reporting current events.Morrand (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Just so there's something there" is not going to help this article if some one comes by to speedy delete per wp:NEOLOGISM. It needs a hard piece of news from an internationally respected outlet (probably business journal). Having this on Wikipedia makes it news, which is not what is supposed to happen. NJGW (talk) 03:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Avoiding wp:NEO[edit]

As we see, this is not a unique term to 2008. Perhaps a better article title would be meltdown monday 2008... although there was anotherone 3 weeks ago too, sooo... yeah. NJGW (talk) 04:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2 in 1 month?[edit]

Oh man, if the last one was a meltdown, what the hell is this? NJGW (talk) 19:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]