Talk:Merb

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Tense

Should nearly everything here be put in the past tense since merb isn't maintained anymore? A bigger deal needs to be made of the Rails 3 merge — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaffachief (talk • contribs) 14:14, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changes and Improvements

MERB is written in Erlang, not Ruby ! I have chosen not to change it, to allow the original editor to look at it. Anyone else is free to do so, because its a bit embarrassing for Wikipedia since so many people are publishing incorrect info from this reference. uaflyer (talk) 16:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it's definitely written in Ruby. You can browse the source if you want to verify it for yourself. JavaTenor (talk) 06:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Engineyard wrote MERB ! Pickup the phone, call Engineyard, or read the presentations referenced. MERB is written in Erlang and this will need to be escalated uaflyer (talk) 20:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, take a look at the source. Notice all those .rb files? They all contain Ruby code. You may be thinking of the Nanite presentation, which is another technology developed at Engine Yard. JavaTenor (talk) 20:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoooops, I edited this page instead of Czech one. Very, very sorry! Botanicus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.115.242.84 (talk) 02:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MERB is totally written in Erlang. Notice the E? MERB stands for Mongrel ERlang RuBy. Get it? It runs in Erlang over Mongrel and SERVES Ruby. Jesus people. Do your research. Engineyard wrote MERB because Rails can't scale and they had to use Erlang to do it. Everybody knows that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.5.72 (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not only is Merb definitely written in Ruby, it is also most certainly notable, at the very least within the ruby community, and i would argue for software development at large (though many may not know it, but hey, that's what education and encyclopedias are about). If you're looking for secondary sources a simple google search turns up a plethora of content:

Frankly it's a bit embarrassing that this article was flagged for notability at all. Much of the ruby world communicates through blog postings, and even in spite of that there are a variety of sources which i've identified (since i'm trying to skew away from blog posts). Additionally, it should not be assumed that merb is primarily notable for merging with Ruby on Rails, both because of the fact that Merb continues as a project independent of Ruby on Rails, as well as the fact that the Merb project was instrumental in lending weight and promotion to several endeavors in the ruby community, such as Rack_(web_server_interface), Datamapper, and jQuery (though jQuery didn't need support in general, Ruby on Rails was designed to interoperate specifically with Prototype an alternative JS library.) Knowtheory (talk) 12:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Merb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]