Talk:Mercedes-Benz S-Class (W222)

So.... is this a joke article?[edit]

This looks like it was re-posted directly from a magazine, or written directly by Mercedes themselves. Why are there statements ending as if questions? Why does this seem entirely POV?

Scryer_360 (talk) 14:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Don't write things like this that tout how American cars (or Japanese, or German... or Yugoslavian) are better than other makes of cars. If you want to post reviews from Automotive Publications than fine, but if you step outside the NPOV rules, the mighty hammer of me will come crashing down."

By all means, crush this article with your hammer then... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.159.23.176 (talk) 17:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

C217.[edit]

There is a separate article Mercedes-Benz S-Class (C217). I think there's too much of it here. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii 22:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Designers[edit]

Il-hun Yoon, Korean designer, created the original design proposal of W222, also he worked on clay model before than Lesnick has been involved in work. Lesnik took part in the work on the clay model, like many other designers working on a car, but his main role was managing. He is design team leader, not the creator, his scetches are postdesign. It's very difficult to find official information in English about the Il-hun Yoon contribution to work on the car. There are a lot of videos on which it can be seen that Mr. Yoon is working on a car, but he is unnamed on those videos. However, I provided a source from Mercedes-Vietnam, I think that's enough. So, I wrote his name in the "Designers" section again and ask to stop removing this information from the page. 95.30.190.231 (talk) 01:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mercedes-Benz S-Class (W222). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]