Jump to content

Talk:Merge (software)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge from Win4Lin

[edit]

I believe Win4Lin, which is closely related subject with no separate notability evident, should be covered in this article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 20:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD for Win4Lin just closed as keep and I've expanded the article with sources as well. I don't think it should be merged into this article. --Odie5533 (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In what way are they closely related, other than both being emulators to run under Linux? There is no connection between the products as far as I can see. The range of operating systems emulated does not even have an intersection according to their respective articles. Merge is for DOS to Win 3.1 and Win4Lin is for Win 95 to XP. SpinningSpark 22:43, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, just saw it in the article, Win4Lin was based on Merge. Nevertheless, a merged article would probably need a new title to encompass them both. Merging into thids one "as is" does not seem like a good idea. SpinningSpark 22:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So, are you against merging at this point? --Odie5533 (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not entirely against merging, I just don't see any particular advantage in doing so. SpinningSpark 17:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So...

[edit]

if Win4Lin bought the assets on NeTraverse, is SCO still selling the old product (pre-Win4Lin) or what? Someone not using his real name (talk) 07:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Merge (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]