Talk:Mesembrinella caenozoica

A fact from Mesembrinella caenozoica appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 January 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Mesembrinella caenozoica is the first unambiguous fossil described in the fly superfamily Oestroidea?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mesembrinella caenozoica.

Wikipedia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caribbean: Dominican Republic Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Dominican Republic portal This article is supported by WikiProject Dominican Republic (assessed as Low-importance).

Diptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

comprised of[edit]

While this isn't policy, I have removed it due to the fact this this phrase can be found almost nowhere on Wikipedia. It is incorrect english.

"To comprise" means "to consist of"
"To comprise of" would therefore mean "to consist of of"

Language critics have claimed that this usage is wrong for a long time.

Redditaddict6 9 20:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not incorrect in English. It is only incorrect when the purposely narrow definition that includes "of" is used. Major dictionaries reflect that the "of is not implicit in the meaning, and is often used without it. Giraffedata purposely ignores that fact in his essay on the subject. Do not change it if you are reverted, and I will note you are now very close to 3RR.--Kev min § 01:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kevmin: I didn't notice the revert when I made the 2nd edit–I'll stop now, sorry. Redditaddict6 9 05:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]