Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Luis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments:

1. The storm originated from an area of low pressure associated with a tropical wave. <-- Yeah, uh, when?
2. ...with a well-defined 46 mi- (74 km) wide eye <-- fix convert/whatever there (don't need the hyphen)
3. I would suggest removing the place names from the headers for consistency.
4. Add a piece of records to the lead.
5. Wikilink Greenland.
6. Split second paragraph of the Bermuda/dissipation section.
7. Find a better image than File:Hurricane Luis on September 6 1995.png.

After this, i am going to put it on hold for fixing.Mitch/HC32 20:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)