Talk:Meteorology (Aristotle)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Oklahoma/History of Science from Antiquity to Newton (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
How to cite quotes from Aristotle
[edit]There's more information on this here (search the page for Meteorology), but I didn't want to add too much because I'm not sure about the proper way to handle references. 128.148.123.31 22:22, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- The proper way to make references is by Bekker numbers. The lack of these references in the page you link shows its deficient quality. I added the reference (339a36-b2) to one quotation. All quotations should be so referenced (preferably by the person introducing them)! Wareh 18:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's amazing what you'll do when your wife is getting the baby to sleep and the brownies are cooling. All the passages quoted by this dubiously constructed article now at least have correct Bekker references. Wareh 23:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
page name
[edit]Shouldn't this be "Meteorology (text)"? -Ravedave (help name my baby) 19:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Dated
[edit]What's the oldest known surviving text for this? Faro0485 (talk) 01:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Wang Chong Not Related
[edit]We should remove Wang Chong from the related section, this individual appears to be irrelevant to the article subject, his existence occurred hundreds of years after the existence of the article subject. 130.56.92.144 (talk) 23:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Aristotle’s Mineral Exhalations
[edit]Although Aristotle did not focus on the mineral world, he did touch upon the subject in the course of meteorological and microphysical considerations. In the Meteorologica,4 he describes the formation of mineral substances5 in terms of subterranean exhalations generated by solar warmth penetrating the earth’s surface and accumulating at depth. This heat could reach subterranean moisture and create a moist exhalation, whereas a dry exhalation was formed by the action of this heat on underground earthy material.6 Aristotle’s physical system considered substances that can exist in both liquid and solid states to be composed of elemental water or a mixture of the elements earth and water, with heat or cold serving as the solidifying agents.7 Aristotle saw the fusibility of the metals as indicative of a liquid component, whereas their erstwhile solidity showed them to also contain a considerable proportion of elemental earthiness. Thus, the metals were considered as composite substances, composed generally of “watery” and “earthy” material.
I took this from AMBIX, Vol. 53, No. 1, March 2006, 43–65 © Society for the History of Alchemy and Chemistry 2006 DOI 10.1179/174582306X93183 The Mineral Exhalation Theory of Metallogenesis in Pre-Modern Mineral Science JOHN A. NORRIS This theory is very important (or was until the 18th century) I hope some one can find the time to add it here.J8079s (talk) 17:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Wind rose
[edit]Hi. I just wrote up a rather large article on Classical compass winds. Since a good chunk of it is based on Aristotle's Meteorology, I wanted to include a brief summary and reference (and maybe one of the diagrams) in this article. Unfortunately, I am not sure where to insert it here (I only read the section on winds and am not sure where exactly it fits viz. the rest of the book, as categorized in this article. Moreover, I'm rather mystified by "Bekker numbers"). If anyone could elucidate, or insert a note, I'd much appreciate it. Walrasiad (talk) 04:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your interest. The basic problem is that this article is a low-quality primary-source-based article with a few random vignettes in lieu of a discussion of the subject according to what reliable sources say. That said, this would actually make it very easy for you to write up a new section "Describes Classical compass winds." Where to insert it is not a big issue: at the end or wherever makes sense to you (the current sections are not sequential: perhaps they should be rearranged). If you write something and put it in the "wrong" place, we'll love you for it nonetheless, and anyone who cares is welcome to move it!
- Bekker numbers are the standard system of citation when quoting Aristotle. Book/chapter numbers as you used at CCW are fine too. Anyway, you can see from the marginal numbers and letters here that the Bekker reference for Meteorology II.6 (which I believe is what you're interested in) is approximately 363a21-365a12.
- If you do add a section here, and if you do quote here (or elsewhere) a short text of Aristotle, it is appropriate to give the Bekker reference if possible, as this will enable readers to find the passage with greater precision. Wareh (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Peer review of your article "Meteorology (Aristotle)" by a fellow student of History of Science course
[edit]Hello fellow student or scholar. I am here to review the article, and eventually copy-edit the article. I added the banner showing "subject of an educational assignment" at or near the top this talk page. Your introduction seems good. However, I think the phrase "ca 800 CE" might be expanded for clarity, so it could be written "circa 800 BCE" if this is what you really mean to convey to the reader. Also, several photos should be in the article as illustrations of the major points and concepts, or at least one photo should be there to illustrate the overall concept of Aristotle's meteorology. If I'm not mistaken, the big deals missing from the article are any primary sources that can be cited as references, by using the \<ref\> tag (without slashes). If this link to a kind of Meteorology book by Aristle is a viable source from MIT then it could be cited as a reference, again using the \<ref\> tag code. Otherwise, the article generally alright. Petesimon2 (talk) 05:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Meteorology (Aristotle). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040405074445/http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/a/a8met/ to http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/a/a8met/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Ancient Greece
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 28 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ohebert19 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Jack Oppen, Jonathan D12.
— Assignment last updated by Cpowers20 (talk) 03:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Wind flow
[edit]I think what's missing in this article is something very important which is Aristotle description of the wind flows in book 1 Chapter 13. He describes it like a fluid which we take for granted in today's English language. He many not be the first but his earliest evidence we have it seems:
Εἰσὶ δέ τινες οἵ φασι τὸν καλούμενον ἀέρα κινού- μενον μὲν καὶ ῥέοντα ἄνεμον εἶναι
105.226.56.148 (talk) 13:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Text Reliability
[edit]The article doesn’t discuss whether or not the text we have today is authentic considering the conquest of Egypt. 105.224.251.80 (talk) 06:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class philosophical literature articles
- Low-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- C-Class Ancient philosophy articles
- Low-importance Ancient philosophy articles
- Ancient philosophy task force articles