Talk:Metro Broadcast Corporation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Why delete the CEO photo? I don't understand, is it unimportant? Also, do you guys think that our page has so few photos, just the signs of the programme? I think it is quite boring. Moreover, why delete the photo of CEO? People may not know who is he. If the photo is so big, then we can make it smaller, so it will not attract others as before.0101LEUNGCAROL 02:31, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What else should we add? In fact, it seems too formal and informative, so how do we make it more interesting?0101LEUNGCAROL 12:43, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


I think the page has taken a biased turn towards just promoting Metro Radio (obviously using promotional material as its main sources). I think there has to be a concerted effort to provide more unbiased info about the stations, more detail on what topics they focus on.


Don't Forget to Sign-off on your comment

Good points above, but don't forget to sign off with your name by typing "~" four times. 0101TA 14:50, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Metro Radio Hong Kong Group members

  • Your intro currently makes it sound like they specialize in medical care broadcasting. “Focusing on Education and Medical care, they provide 14 programmes concerning health care per week to promote proper health knowledge, and to support the government's policy of combating SARS.” Remember, your intro needs to be an overview of what the station is about, listing the most important information on top. Their headquarter location do not need to be in the intro.
  • NPOV! “Metro Showbiz breaking new ground in radio history”—is public relations talk. Breaking new ground according to whom? Just give us the facts. Unless you can refer to some unbiased study, don’t need to try to “sell” Metro Radio.
  • Add more links and references.
  • See more comments at the JMSC0101 WebCT Discussion Section 0101TA 15:34, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Resize your pics"

pictures should supplement not dominate your wiki entry. resize them please. 0101TA 08:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

grammer, grammer, grammer[edit]

I don't mean to re-write peoples submissions, but some of the sections I have trouble making sense of, and english is my first language. I think its coming along, I think its time to focus on more journalistic approaches (since its a journalism class) and less almost verbatim rehashing. I think we should add more background on the company and its major players. I like the timeline, I think we can work on that and make it more of an article representing both the growth of metro and its change in content. I also like the case about the corrupt awards show, but I found myself having to re-write alot of it, and its still slightly incoherent, but good research.0101BRIDGEeh 09:02, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Delete the Photo of Metro radio[edit]

I have deleted the photo showing the appearence of the Metro Radio as I personally think it is not necessary to include the photo which is not so informative. What do you think about it? --0101CHENGkm 09:16, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Delete the part "others"[edit]

I have deleted the part "Others" which focus on Lee Ka Shing as I think we do not need to stress on him. --0101CHENGkm 09:45, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Delete the photo of Kam Kwok Leung[edit]

I have deleted the photo of Kam Kwok Leung since I think that the photo may be dominant to draw the readers'attention from the article. --0101CHENGkm 16:26, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Add the photo of metro radio[edit]

I added the photo once again. Though it is not very informative, it can capture the attention of the readers. What do you guys think? 0101LAMyk 09:56, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Add the photo of metro radio is needed[edit]

Our work is to draw the attention of people. Readers will become bored if the screen is full of word!! Add back the photo is needed! And we have tried our best to do this project!! Well done!! --0101CHOYwk 11:28, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Top 01.gif[edit]

Image:Top 01.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Metrobroadcastlogo.jpg[edit]

Image:Metrobroadcastlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Metro Broadcast Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metro Broadcast Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Metro_Broadcast_Corporation&oldid=1201746971"