Talk:Metropolitan Tower (Manhattan)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 04:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
This looks like another excellent article on the architecture of New York by Epicgenius and is therefore likely to be close to Good Article status already. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Comments[edit]
This is a stable and well-written article. 74.7% of authorship is by Epicgenius and 22.6% by Abductive. It is currently ranked C class.
- The article is of appropriate length, with 3,290 words of readable prose.
- There are no obvious spelling or grammar errors.
- It is written in a summary style, consistent with relevant Manuals of Style.
- Earwig's Copyvio Detector identifies a 19.4% chance of copyright violation with a 1990 article by Goldberger cited in the article. The item is directly quoted and appropriately referenced.
- All images have appropriate licensing and either CC or public domain tags.
- References appear to be from reputable sources.
I will now complete the review. simongraham (talk) 05:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Assessment[edit]
The six good article criteria:
- It is reasonable well written
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- It is factually accurate and verifiable
- it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- all inline citations are from reliable sources;
- it contains no original research;
- it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
- it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- It is broad in its coverage
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
- It has a neutral point of view
- it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- It is stable
- it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
- images are (relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
- images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
Congratulations, Epicgenius. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.
- Pass simongraham (talk) 05:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)