Talk:Michael Atiyah/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 13:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Linkrot: five found, three fixed and two tagged.[2] Jezhotwells (talk) 13:46, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Two dead links in the External links section. I couldn't find them in the internet archive, I guess you could just remove them.
- All other references check out.
- I placed some citation needed tags on paragraphs which contain statements that need citing.
Not done
- I see that the dead links have been removed, but nothing has been done about the needed citations. This needs to be fixed, the deadline is 21 November. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Broad and focussed.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutral
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Correctly tagged, licensed and captioned
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- On hold for seven days for the issues above to be addressed.
- Well the citation needed tgs have not been addressed so I am failing this as seven days have elapsed. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: