Talk:Michael Cammalleri/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
very good and easy prose

there should be more information about his religiosity; does he practice Jewish traditions? Or is he more liberal?
Sources conflict on this point. The "Cammalleri is Jewish" opening line is not my addition but I realize that it isn't going anywhere without an edit war. one source says he observes Jewish holidays. Another says he was raised secular. A third gives no indication of the importance of religion in his life. Lacking a consistent message, I prefer to leave the section as is. Reso lute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
the "by whom" tag in the last picture's and the playing style section should be resolved.
Reworded for clarity. Reso lute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

high-quality sources

overall good reference formatting, but the dates were inconsistent, so I changed to classic mdy format.

I fixed one minor error in one reference
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
no trivia; focused
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
no bias
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
as semi-protected
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
high-quality pictures are properly licensed
Overall: I see you are a WikiCup entrant, and you have only 10 points :/. Sorry for the delay, I was busy, but also a bit lazy :).
Pass/Fail:

No worries on the Wikicup. If I was truly dedicated to it this year, I'dve had several articles queued up. Appreciate the review, and hopefully I have addressed your concerns. Thanks! Reso lute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]