Talk:Michael Laucke discography and filmography/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Italics -vs- double quote marks
Major works, compilations, CDs, and LPs should be in italics.
Songs, tracks, minor pieces, and minor works should be in double straight quote marks. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 18:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Many thanks! I'll look this over later; there's is probably some work to be done in this area in the M.L. article as well. very best wishes, Natalie --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 19:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- ...The coast is clear
; all songs and tracks are now in double straight quote marks, major works and CDs in italics. I think it's ready to Move. Would I simply use the 'Move page' menu, then choose (Article) for new title and rename the article 'Michael Laucke discography and filmography'. Sound about right? Alas, if something goes awry, then one can't delete the page... very best, Natalie Natalie.Desautels (talk) 22:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Natalie.Desautels. You got it. Good luck. Cheers!
{{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}03:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Natalie.Desautels. You got it. Good luck. Cheers!
- Hi Checkingfax. Top of the afternoon to you
. I think 'Michael Laucke discography and filmography' is ready to be moved into mainspace. Would you concur? kindest regards, Natalie Desautels …as within, so without 19:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Checkingfax. Top of the afternoon to you
- Hi, Natalie.Desautels. Looks OK to me. Do you need any tips? Make sure to put it in article namespace (the default is user namespace); be sure to trim off the sandbox portion of the article name; put a note that you are moving it from user namespace to article namespace; move the article and the user page or you can start with a fresh user page if you want to by unticking that checkbox.
- The References are showing in one column; I fixed it to show in two columns, but they are back to one column. Go ahead and move it, and we can deal with that gremlin later. Cheers!
{{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}22:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- The References are showing in one column; I fixed it to show in two columns, but they are back to one column. Go ahead and move it, and we can deal with that gremlin later. Cheers!
- Checkingfax. Thanks for the timely advice. I see the references are a bit out of date compared to the ML article. I'll attend to this and then, ...what was that American expression you used when you moved ML for me the first time – oh yes – Yeehaw ! Natalie Desautels …as within, so without 22:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Checkingfax. Thanks for the timely advice. I see the references are a bit out of date compared to the ML article. I'll attend to this and then, ...what was that American expression you used when you moved ML for me the first time – oh yes – Yeehaw !