Talk:Michael M. Gilday
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael M. Gilday article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Capitalization
[edit]Am editor wrote on an edit comment that “if the link has to be piped to decapitalise, then the original is not in contravention of MOS:JOBTITLES”. This is incorrect. MOS:JOBTITLES doesn’t relate to linking. Instead, MOS:JOBTITLES states that modified job titles (job titles preceded by adjectives like “32nd”, “the”, “acting”, and “next’) are correctly lowercased. —Eyer (If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}}
to your message to let me know.) 11:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support edit by Eyer. Capitalisation of article titles when used as links can be context sensitive. At the very least, article titles are written in sentence case and should be rendered in lower case as a link if they are not a "proper name" (and not at the start of a sentence. Capitalisation of "jobtitles" is context specific per the guideline. All of the cases downcased by Eyer are "preceded by a modifier". Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 07:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed with Eyer and Cinderella157. The unspecified reverter-to-overcapitalisation's rationale is simply false, or the guideline in question would not exist. And "minimizing the number of piped links", as it were, is not any kind of Wikipedia goal, or link piping would not be a feature. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 14:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles