Talk:Michelle Waterson-Gomez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Michelle Waterson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Michelle Waterson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Michelle Waterson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo requested[edit]

CataracticPlanets’ revision under the title "deleted irrelevant and inappropriate "external images" section" merits close attention. Treating this section as something foreign to the article, he does not explain, unfortunately, what distinguishes relevant images from irrelevant ones. On what grounds does he proclaim the section in question to be inappropriate? One must not forget about the fact that Pani Waterson is not only a fighter but also a model. In addition, she is an actress. Hence it follows that her photos are "an important illustrative aid to understanding." --Janggun Dungan (talk) 19:11, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

long n borin -- spice it up[edit]

article is too long and boring for this girl. more fitting of some old washed up fart like paul mccartney or yoko ono. can someone spice it up? how bout some risque fotos? Senor dellums (talk) 23:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janggun Dungan (talk • contribs) [reply]

Adding images to Wikipedia articles is something more than an arbitrary arrangement of arbitrarily dug-up photos:

Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context!!!!!!

According to the rules of our encyclopaedia, the significance of images consists in their providing "an important illustrative aid to understanding." That cannot be said of this photo which does not give us an illustration relying on what one could understand the generally accepted point of view, according to which Michelle Waterson is the most beautiful woman in MMA. She is much more beautiful in real life than she looks on the above-mentioned photo. Upload another one.

Besides, Gomez (thehulk) has shown with profound penetration that the whole variety of Michelle Waterson's images is divided into two mutually exclusive categories: 1) "This is how she looks when not in the ring" 2) "And THIS is how she looks inside the ring." In this type of classification, this photo belongs to the second category. Now it is incumbent on us to upload an image from the first category which the most interesting one. As an example, take this amazing photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons in order to overcome one-sidedness in the treatment of the subject-matter of the present article. --Janggun Dungan (talk) 11:26, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Usually the greatest restriction is the Wikipedia:Image use policy, namely that photos need to be explicitly free to reuse and edit like the rest of the Wikipedia. Most photos that can be found on the web, including that Instagram image, aren't. If you want to take some free photos, or convince the photographer or other copyright owner of photos to make them free, please go ahead, and we'd love to use them. Until then, though, this is the best we can get. --GRuban (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GRuban: So I regret to admit that uploading the submitted photo, to use Aigerim Mergenbay's words, is "мүмкін емес." BTW, I've read your interview with Rob Walker. Thx for interesting information. To tell the truth, I'm not surprised at the fact that a journalist doesn't feel like sharing his images with Wikipedia and

tried to convince him (you) that nobody really cared what I (he) look like.

But I can't understand that such a pretty model as Michelle Waterson adheres to a conviction which is similar in principle to that of Rob Walker. Everybody cares how a model looks like. --Janggun Dungan (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to ask her to release a free photo. Sometimes it works. Rarely, but not 0. See Wikipedia:Example requests for permission for templates. --GRuban (talk) 16:11, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 April 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) MaterialWorks (contribs) 20:23, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Waterson → Michelle Waterson-Gomez – Per WP:NAMECHANGES she already uses the name on her UFC profile Sherdog profile and instagram Nswix (talk) 18:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Michelle_Waterson-Gomez&oldid=1210557083"