Talk:Mickleham, Surrey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is this meant to mean?[edit]

"the small settlement lay within the Copthorne hundred used for meetings of the wealthy and powerful for strategic purposes in Anglo-Saxon England" - is this meant to be an explanation of what a hundred was? Because (1) it's not very good and (2) it's entirely irrelevant. Zythophile (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat rude and judgemental. Suffice it to say it means this was a device of the feudal system. That in itself has mirrors in the present global corporate system. It certainly has few mirrors in public administration today.- Adam37 Talk 16:23, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mickleham, Surrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mickleham, Surrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mickleham, Surrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

History - tunnel deaths[edit]

(My first venture into Talk). I believe the mention of deaths of 90 navvies during construction of the railway tunnel under Norbury Park (frequently referred to as Box Hill Tunnel) relates to Box Tunnel in Wiltshire where around 100 died during construction. Box Hill Tunnel is only a few hundred yards long and goes through easy chalk. See Box Tunnel Wikipedia page. NigelTQ15 (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing heard in reply. Corrected 27/05/2018 by deletion of the sentence "Ninety Victorian workmen, "considered navvies", died in an accident when a tunnel they were working on, through Norbury Park, within the parish, collapsed. " — Preceding unsigned comment added by NigelTQ15 (talkcontribs) 15:42, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you're right. Eric Pode lives (talk) 10:11, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]