Talk:Microgrant

International development Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by Verity50 (talk · contribs) on 25 June 2009.
It was contested by Spaceman7Spiff (talk · contribs) on 2009-06-25 with the comment:
Trademark is not for this term, this is a dicdef for Transwiki and/or discussion for merge to microcredit, spam removed, alternate ref added.

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 June 2009. The result of the discussion was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW.

Layout Issues[edit]

The article appears to run afoul of Wikipedia's layout guidelines, especially with regard to listing information in subsections. Some information also appears to be out of order. For example, information concerning the types of microgrants appears before the general statement as to what a microgrant is, which should be the lead sentence. In addition, the general statement itself (with the titular word bolded) explains only one type of microgrant, and it appears under what should be a subsection. The entire layout of this article seems quite disjointed. MarsTheGrayAdept (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This continues to be a problem. It presents a specific case as the general case. This requires the attention of serious Wikipedians and is beyond the ability of anonymous lurkers like myself to fix. Someone should reorganize this article, or failing that, flag it for attention.