This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Middle Ages is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 12, 2013.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
@Norfolkbigfish: I highly appreciate your constant attempts to contribute to our community efforts. However, please try to avoid original research and also try to use the "Preview" button before saving your edits to avoid obviously distructive edits. For instance, could your refer to reliable sources stating that the Middle Ages "saw the rise of agriculture as the primary economic force", or to scholarly works suggesting that Germanic migrations began in the Early Middle Ages? I know that WP can be edited by any editors but editors who do not have a certain level of knowledge about an article's topic can hardly improve it without familiarising themselves with the relevant literature. Sorry, I must revert all your edits because they did not improve the article, and I do not have time to correct all of your misinterpretations. Borsoka (talk) 01:53, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There were review comments unactioned at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Middle Ages/archive1 since the 21st October, so in attempt to move these on I summarized the lead and another section as the comments suggested. No factual information was added. The article says Scholarly consensus characterises the period by the economic predominance of agriculture and the issue with Germanic migrations required a tweak in language to position this as a precursor to Early Middle Ages rather than a constituent part. A reversion was therefore disproportionate. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please compare the verified text you quoted from the article what you wrote before commenting. If a short text contains two unverified statements, its total reversion is not dispoportionate. Borsoka (talk) 11:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I must apologise before the whole community because my edits destroyed an FA and as a consequence it was delisted. The destroyed version must obviously be restored because our readers cannot be forced to read a version representing a lower standard than the restored version. I urge the original nominators to re-nominate their version. I will show my contrition for my distruptive edits by comments during the process. Borsoka (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
