This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of August 31, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
1. Well written?: Written in clear and understandable language.
Please break apart the References section into separate Notes and References subsections.
Do we really need all those long quotes within the cited References? They could probably be removed, WP:V is satisfied without them.
3. Broad in coverage?: Adequately covers various aspects of the individual's life and career.
4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be written in a neutrally worded manner.
5. Article stability? Article is stable. No evidence of any conflict in the edit history or on the talk page.
6. Images?: No images. Would be nice to have some, but without any there is nothing to critique here.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 04:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why is the story of Mr. Bullen's life divided up into sections of 2 to 3 years each? There do not seem to be notable events that mark changes in his life, as far as I can see unless I am missing something. Jaque Hammer (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
