Talk:Mike Erickson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Erickson and Abortion Scandal[edit]

The discussion of Erickson's abortion scandal currently sounds like the women in question's friend is making the accusation alone. After reviewing the cited articles, it is clear that both the woman who had the abortion and her friend are making the accusation although only the friend is named. I'll edit the page to make this clear, but some other wikipedians may want to re-edit for clarity.

Ahimsa52 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 18:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mike Erickson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2022 campaign links[edit]

These links were included in the article but need to be used as references for content, not just as bare links.

  1. Erickson hopes third time’s the charm in OR legislature run[1]
  2. 7 candidates in 6th Congressional District Republican primary[2]
  3. Oregon’s new Congressional district draws a big field of candidates and big spending[3]
  4. Questions remain as race for nomination to represent Oregon’s 6th District in Congress nears finish line[4]
  5. Mike Erickson running for Oregon's new 6th Congressional District[5]
  6. Oregon 6th District Demos: Men raise more money than women[6]

References

  1. ^ Boddie, Ken (Apr 10, 2022). "Erickson hopes third time's the charm in OR legislature run". KOIN 6.
  2. ^ Radnovich, Connor (April 19, 2022). "7 candidates in 6th Congressional District Republican primary". Statesman Journal.
  3. ^ Stites, Sam (May 3, 2022). "Oregon's new Congressional district draws a big field of candidates and big spending". OPB.
  4. ^ Lehman, Chris (May 7, 2022). "Questions remain as race for nomination to represent Oregon's 6th District in Congress nears finish line". The Oregonian.
  5. ^ "Mike Erickson running for Oregon's new 6th Congressional District". KATU 2. May 8, 2022. {{cite news}}: |first= missing |last= (help)
  6. ^ Wong, Peter (May 9, 2022). "Oregon 6th District Demos: Men raise more money than women". Portland Tribune.

DUI[edit]

Would a mention of a previous DUI charge, linked to this source be considered to be UNDUE? I don't see any coverage in The Oregonian but this is the local paper for the city that Erickson has a mailing address in. Liz Read! Talk! 18:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Lake Oswego Review is a longstanding serious newspaper with a good editorial structure. This seems like some of the most focused news coverage (not opinion coverage) of the race I've seen, seems like a high quality source for this topic. I would include anything identified in that article as significant to the race or the candidates. Good catch. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 21:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]