Talk:Mike Hudema

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMike Hudema has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 22, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Conflict disclosure[edit]

I just want to disclose at this point that I am in a potential conflict of interest, as I know Mike reasonably well. I believe that, in writing this article, I have adhered completely to User:Uncle G's [on writing about subjects close to you] (which isn't policy, but which is damned good advice). That said, now that I've created the article I won't make any contentious edits to it; I will participate in any debates on this talk page, however. Sarcasticidealist 13:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold comments[edit]

I think this article is definitely viable for GA, just a few things...

  • The lead section does not summarize the text of the article completely. A paragraph or two would be appropriate. The sentence currently there would be a good start for the paragraph, just a few more details should be added, as I did not get a very full picture of the article's subject. (See here).
  • A more detailed method of citation is recommended at WP:CITE here. As many of the URLs cited here are news articles, it seems appropriate to use the news citation method. Citation templates like {{cite news}} and {{cite web}} might be useful. The article is very well footnoted, it's just the citations themselves are not very thorough.
  • There are a number of short sections (starting with "Anti-war activism) that might be better suited to a consolidated paragraph or two, perhaps under the heading of "Other activism." If there is more information in these sections that simply hasn't been added, then of course my opinion would change.
  • Though this isn't required for a GA, it seems to me that many of the images might be better suited if they were smaller, as they are (to my eyes) disrupting the article's text in some places.

Kakofonous (talk) 15:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance of a 24 hour extension on this? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. That sounds fine. Kakofonous (talk) 19:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think I've incorporated the changes you suggested, but please let me know if there's anything further that I should do (whether to meet GA standards or for any other reason). Sarcasticidealist (talk) 03:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article is now of GA quality. Kakofonous (talk) 03:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 22, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Definitely.
2. Factually accurate?: So many sources! Sorry I made you go through all of the citations and reformat them.
3. Broad in coverage?: Yes.
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images?: Great choices, all of them free.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Kakofonous (talk) 03:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA status[edit]

Too many citations needed and a general choppyness to the prose (single sentence paragraphs, diary entry format etc). Needs some love if it is to not be delisted. AIRcorn (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Mike Hudema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mike Hudema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Mike Hudema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mike Hudema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]