Jump to content

Talk:Mike Scully/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    This article is well written and is sufficiently compliant with the MoS.
    I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All on line references are live
    The article is adequately referenced.
    All references appear to be WP:RS
    All the on-line sources support the cited statements. I assume good faith for off-line sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The article is braod and focussed. It will need contious updates as Scully's career progresses.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    One image used, correctly licensend and captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Well, this is good to go. I am happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]