Talk:Mike Scully/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- All on line references are live
- The article is adequately referenced.
- All references appear to be WP:RS
- All the on-line sources support the cited statements. I assume good faith for off-line sources.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- The article is braod and focussed. It will need contious updates as Scully's career progresses.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- One image used, correctly licensend and captioned.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Well, this is good to go. I am happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thanks very much! Gran2 22:50, 8 April 2010 (UTC)