Talk:Mikhail Mikhailovich Golitsyn (admiral)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mikhail Mikhailovich Golitsyn (admiral) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Russian & Soviet / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Number of admirals-general[edit]

The article General admiral shows four prior admirals-general and four later, but the reference at rusnavy.com has him as the third, and only three (named) subsequent. For now I'm going with the latter because it is an apparently authoritative source. Perhaps there are different definitions of the rank, or the imperial navy, here? David Brooks (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]