Talk:Mill Hill County High School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why the name (and change)?[edit]

Why was it called Orange Hill, and when and why was it changed to Hill Mill? --24.182.92.247 (talk) 19:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was never called Orange Hill and this article is a little misleading. The school was originally called Moat Mount Secondary Modern. Orange Hill was a grammar school in Burnt Oak. In about 1971 Moat Mount school became a comprehensive. In the late 80s, Orange Hill was closed and merged with Moat Mount, creating a grant-maintained school. Moat Mount had had a bad reputation locally in the 60s and 70s, both academically and for problems with behaviour (school pupils and staff!). The modern school is quite different and much bigger. It now has 1700 kids compared to less than 1000 when I was there in the 70s.
I think this page used to have the history and I am puzzled why it was removed, leaving a confusing picture and eradicating the existence of Moat Mount completely. Particularly odd since the school backs onto Moat Mount fields. Joss (talk) 15:25, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mill Hill County High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]