Jump to content

Talk:Mindfulness

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Greek translation[edit]

νοοσυγκρότηση — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8AB8:3F00:8943:9A30:700B:4FD4 (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Mindfulness relaxation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 11 § Mindfulness relaxation until a consensus is reached. — SamX [talk · contribs · he/him] 04:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The definition of mindfulness is not supported by the sources[edit]

I have changed the first sentence because the references do not support "conceptual reification." There are many forms of mindfulness and we don't get to pick the one we like best. It remains a capacious and muddy term with competing definitions. The lead should reflect that.DolyaIskrina (talk) 18:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2024 and 4 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sj4452 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Sj4452 (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adverese effects[edit]

The last week or so I have added new material to this article. This is so because this article lacks a section on adverse effects. This is unacceptable. We nowdays have peer-rewied studies that convincingly show that meditation/mindfullness is not an innocuous practice. This information must be offered to the readers of wikipedia up-front (as is done in other articles, e.g., on SSRI-drugs or psychotherapy), and not embedded or hidden under other sections, or underepresented, so that they can make informed choices as to whether they want to use these techniques or not. The section on "risks" is so small as to be patronizing and threfore I deleted it and fused its content with the new section/heading. Didaktron (talk) 20:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]