Talk:Minimum wage in China

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

whole list is wrong[edit]

10 yuan are 1 dollar, the whole list is also corrupt why there 3 numbers?--Noelmantra (talk) 01:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page was first written by someone in April 2011; figures and exchange values may have changed since then. Feel free to fix up the article by updating the correct values. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 02:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


People in hong kong work more than 5 days a week on average (6-7 days) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.189.231 (talk) 04:47, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can read this in the Wikipedia RMB¥ article ... ( Renminbe Yuan )[edit]

"the official USD to RMB exchange rate declined from 1.50 yuan in 1980 to 8.62 yuan by 1994 (lowest ever on the record)"

The 5 April 2013 exchange rate is 6.202 "Renminbi Yuan" to 1 US dollar. The rate was never 10 Yuan to 1 USD ...

A friend from Shanghai tell me yesterday that list is OK, just out of date. The wages are a little higher in 2013 but not much.

Does somebody know such a Wikipedia article exist in french ?

If not, I will probably publish one ...

--Alain Poitras (talk) 17:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS : Yes, that page exist on the french Wikipedia side ...

Some questions about updating.[edit]

The minimum wage in China is rapidly increasing. New updates are required on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.24.184.194 (talk) 10:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As we know, a table like that is important to compare the minimum wage in many countries and also to compare average stands of life. If an editor just update a part of the table, this will change the average of the table, then give us an incorrect understanding. It would be nice if all updating let it clear if all the table was updated or just a part of it. I'm talking about this because I saw Beijing and some others Provinces were updated in 2015, April, and I wander what happenned with the others that mantain the same figures. They still have the same figures or the author doesn't have the information?

Last but not least, I would like to thank all the people that are doing this so usefull job.